Here is another one: Three Body Problem. When this was posted the arguments revolved around reasons why the points in the article don't need to be addressed, rather than actually addressing them. Here is one: Astronomy is a pseudoescience. When the RE here are presented with those articles we mainly just see some kind of argument about why they don't have to address it.
There are plenty of platforms they can publish on. I want them to go to and conduct opposition research on their specific subject of interest and provide an equal or greater amount of evidence showing that the points in the articles are false. Tell them that I don't want a chatroom debate.
0 kommentar(er)
