Consequently, the measures and tools used in traditional military-led cross-border wars to adequately tally wounded and dead for many decades under the mandates of the International Humanitarian Law, is insufficient for modern warfare. In contrast to military-led cross-border traditional wars, modern armed conflicts affect internally on local communities and take civilian lives. The scientific evidence of selected article was assessed, using the Health Evidence Quality Assessment Tool.įindings: The review of 66 included articles in this study indicates that with an increasing number of public health emergencies and the lack of vital elements of life such as water and food, emerging armed conflicts seem to be inevitable. The outcome was analyzed using a qualitative inductive thematic analysis. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science search engines. Objective: To examine the possibility of estimating the number of civilian casualties in modern armed conflicts. 4Department of Aviation Security, Military University of Aviation, Dȩblin, Poland.Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States 3Harvard Humanitarian Initiative, T.H.2Department of Research and Development, Armed Forces Center for Defense Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden.
1Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden.Burkle 3 Krzysztof Goniewicz 4 Yohan Robinson 1,2
0 kommentar(er)
